lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HK2PR01MB328183C5595B0BD046146B41FA940@HK2PR01MB3281.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:28:09 +0000
From:   Johnson CH Chen (陳昭勳) 
        <JohnsonCH.Chen@...a.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: ds1374_wdt: Introduce Dallas/Maxim DS1374
 Watchdog driver

Hi,

Thanks for your good detailed suggestions!

> > + * It would be more efficient to use i2c msgs/i2c_transfer directly
> > +but, as
> > + * recommened in .../Documentation/i2c/writing-clients section
> > + * "Sending and receiving", using SMBus level communication is preferred.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/ioctl.h>
> > +#include <linux/reboot.h>
> > +#include <linux/watchdog.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> 
> Alphabetic order please.
> 
> > +
> > +#define DEVNAME                 "ds1374_wdt"
> > +
> > +#define DS1374_REG_WDALM0	0x04 /* Watchdog/Alarm */
> > +#define DS1374_REG_WDALM1	0x05
> > +#define DS1374_REG_WDALM2	0x06
> > +#define DS1374_REG_CR		0x07 /* Control */
> > +#define DS1374_REG_CR_AIE	0x01 /* Alarm Int. Enable */
> > +#define DS1374_REG_CR_WDSTR     0x08 /* 1=INT, 0=RST */
> > +#define DS1374_REG_CR_WDALM	0x20 /* 1=Watchdog, 0=Alarm */
> > +#define DS1374_REG_CR_WACE	0x40 /* WD/Alarm counter enable */
> > +
> > +/* Default margin */
> > +#define WD_TIMO                 131762
> > +#define TIMER_MARGIN_MIN	4096 /* 1s */
> > +#define TIMER_MARGIN_MAX	(60*60*24*4096) /* one day */
> > +
> > +static int wdt_margin = WD_TIMO;
> 
> Sjould not be pre-initialized. Also, 131762 isn't 32 seconds, it is 131,762
> seconds.
> 

131762 is 32 seconds actually because watchdog counter increases per 
1/4096 seconds for DS1374. If DS1374_REG_CR_WDALM is set to 0 (alarm), 
alarm counter will increase per 1 second.

> > +module_param(wdt_margin, int, 0);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(wdt_margin, "Watchdog timeout in seconds (default
> > +32s)");
> > +
> 
> As a new driver, it would be better to just use the customary "timeout".
> 
> > +static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT; module_param(nowayout,
> > +bool, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout, "Watchdog cannot be stopped
> once
> > +started default ="
> > +		__MODULE_STRING(WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT) ")");
> > +
> > +struct ds1374_wdt {
> > +	struct i2c_client *client;
> > +	struct watchdog_device *wdt;
> > +	struct work_struct work;
> 
> Not used.
> 
> > +
> > +	/* The mutex protects alarm operations, and prevents a race
> > +	 * between the enable_irq() in the workqueue and the free_irq()
> > +	 * in the remove function.
> > +	 */
> 
> There is no workqueue here, and the remove function is not needed.
> 
> > +	struct mutex mutex;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct watchdog_info ds1374_wdt_info = {
> > +	.identity       = DEVNAME,
> > +	.options        = WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT | WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING |
> > +						WDIOF_MAGICCLOSE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct watchdog_device ds1374_wdd;
> > +
> Move declaration please.
> 
> > +static int ds1374_wdt_settimeout(struct watchdog_device *wdt,
> > +					unsigned int timeout)
> > +{
> 
> How is this synchronized against accesses by the RTC driver ?
> 
By original design in rtc-ds1374.c, it seems no synchronized problem between 
rtc and watchdog, but I think we can add mutex lock to deal with it.

> > +	int ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> 
> Not an appropriate error code here.
> 
> > +	u8 buf[4];
> > +	int cr, i;
> > +	struct ds1374_wdt *drv_data = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt);
> > +
> > +	ret = cr = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(drv_data->client, DS1374_REG_CR);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto out;
> 
> "goto out;" is unnecessary. Just return the error. Same everywhere else below.
> 
> > +
> > +	/* Disable any existing watchdog/alarm before setting the new one */
> > +	cr &= ~DS1374_REG_CR_WACE;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(drv_data->client, DS1374_REG_CR, cr);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	/* Set new watchdog time */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > +		buf[i] = timeout & 0xff;
> > +		timeout >>= 8;
> > +	}
> 
> The value passed to this function from the watchdog core is the timeout in
> seconds. I don't see a conversion to internal values here.
> 

For original design in rtc-ds1374.c, ds1374_wdt_settimeout () will call 
ds1374_write_rtc() to write hardware register. To separate watchdog and rtc 
functions, expand code from ds1374_write_rtc() here, and final buf[] values 
will be written into hardware register for DS1374.

> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(drv_data->client,
> > +						DS1374_REG_WDALM0, 3, buf);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		pr_info("couldn't set new watchdog time\n");
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> 
> > +
> > +	/* Enable watchdog timer */
> > +	cr |= DS1374_REG_CR_WACE | DS1374_REG_CR_WDALM;
> > +	cr &= ~DS1374_REG_CR_WDSTR;/* for RST PIN */
> > +	cr &= ~DS1374_REG_CR_AIE;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(drv_data->client, DS1374_REG_CR, cr);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> 
> Pointless. Just return ret.
> 
> Also, this function needs to store the new timeout in struct watchdog_device.
> 
> > +out:
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Read WD/Alarm counter to reload the watchdog timer. (ie, pat the
> > +watchdog)  */ static int ds1374_wdt_ping(struct watchdog_device *wdt)
> > +{
> > +	struct ds1374_wdt *drv_data = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt);
> > +	int ret;
> > +	u8 buf[4];
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(drv_data->client,
> > +						DS1374_REG_WDALM0, 3, buf);
> > +
> > +	if (ret < 0 || ret < 3)
> > +		pr_info("WD TICK FAIL!!!!!!!!!! %i\n", ret);
> > +
> 
> This is not an info message, this is an error. Besides, it is just noise.
> Just return the error and drop the message.
> 
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ds1374_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdt) {
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = ds1374_wdt_settimeout(wdt, wdt_margin);
> 
> This is wrong. The timeout may have been updated by userspace.
> It is inappropriate to change it back to the default here.
> 
Thanks, I will keep in mind.

> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ds1374_wdt_ping(wdt);
> 
> Please do not ignore errors.
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ds1374_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdt) {
> > +	struct ds1374_wdt *drv_data = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt);
> > +	int cr;
> > +
> > +	if (nowayout)
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Not needed.
> 
Thanks!, it has been implemented in watchdog_stop().

> > +
> > +	cr = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(drv_data->client, DS1374_REG_CR);
> > +	/* Disable watchdog timer */
> > +	cr &= ~DS1374_REG_CR_WACE;
> > +
> > +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(drv_data->client, DS1374_REG_CR,
> > +cr); }
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Handle commands from user-space.
> > + */
> > +static long ds1374_wdt_ioctl(struct watchdog_device *wdt, unsigned int
> cmd,
> > +				unsigned long arg)
> 
> The whole point of using the watchdog subsystem is to not need a local ioctl
> function - and most definitely not one that duplicates watchdog core
> functionality.
> 
> > +{
> > +	int new_margin, options;
> > +
> > +	switch (cmd) {
> > +	case WDIOC_GETSUPPORT:
> > +		return copy_to_user((struct watchdog_info __user *)arg,
> > +		&ds1374_wdt_info, sizeof(ds1374_wdt_info)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > +
> > +	case WDIOC_GETSTATUS:
> > +	case WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS:
> > +		return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
> > +	case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
> > +		ds1374_wdt_ping(wdt);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	case WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT:
> > +		if (get_user(new_margin, (int __user *)arg))
> > +			return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +		/* the hardware's tick rate is 4096 Hz, so
> > +		 * the counter value needs to be scaled accordingly
> > +		 */
> > +		new_margin <<= 12;
> > +		if (new_margin < 1 || new_margin > 16777216)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +		wdt_margin = new_margin;
> > +		ds1374_wdt_settimeout(wdt, new_margin);
> 
> Is the idea here to bypass the watchdog subsystem's notion of keeping the
> timeout in seconds ? If so, that would be wrong and unacceptable.
> 
It seems take care about 4096Hz for original design in rtc-ds1374.c. I think we
can just use ioctl() which watchdog core provides and input margin time
appropriately.


> > +		ds1374_wdt_ping(wdt);
> > +		fallthrough;
> > +	case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> > +		/* when returning ... inverse is true */
> > +		return put_user((wdt_margin >> 12), (int __user *)arg);
> > +	case WDIOC_SETOPTIONS:
> > +		if (copy_from_user(&options, (int __user *)arg, sizeof(int)))
> > +			return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +		if (options & WDIOS_DISABLECARD) {
> > +			pr_info("disable watchdog\n");
> > +			ds1374_wdt_stop(wdt);
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD) {
> > +			pr_info("enable watchdog\n");
> > +			ds1374_wdt_settimeout(wdt, wdt_margin);
> > +			ds1374_wdt_ping(wdt);
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +	return -ENOTTY;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ds1374_wdt_notify_sys(struct notifier_block *this,
> > +			unsigned long code, void *unused)
> > +{
> > +	if (code == SYS_DOWN || code == SYS_HALT)
> > +		/* Disable Watchdog */
> > +		ds1374_wdt_stop(&ds1374_wdd);
> > +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > +}
> > +
> Not needed - see below.
> 
> > +static struct notifier_block ds1374_wdt_notifier = {
> > +	.notifier_call = ds1374_wdt_notify_sys, };
> > +
> > +static int ds1374_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +	struct ds1374_wdt *drv_data;
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(pdev->dev.parent);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	drv_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct ds1374_wdt),
> > +				GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!drv_data)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	drv_data->wdt = &ds1374_wdd;
> > +	drv_data->client = client;
> > +	mutex_init(&drv_data->mutex);
> > +
> > +	watchdog_init_timeout(drv_data->wdt, wdt_margin, &pdev->dev);
> > +	watchdog_set_nowayout(drv_data->wdt, nowayout);
> > +
> > +	watchdog_set_drvdata(drv_data->wdt, drv_data);
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drv_data);
> > +
> > +	ret = watchdog_register_device(drv_data->wdt);
> 
> Use devm_watchdog_register_device()
> 
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register Watchdog device\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = register_reboot_notifier(&ds1374_wdt_notifier);
> 
> Call watchdog_stop_on_reboot() before calling watchdog_register_device()
> instead.
> 
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		watchdog_unregister_device(drv_data->wdt);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ds1374_wdt_settimeout(drv_data->wdt, wdt_margin);
> 
> Unnecessary here; called from start function.
> 
> > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Dallas/Maxim DS1374 watchdog device
> > +enabled\n");
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ds1374_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +	struct ds1374_wdt *drv_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unregister DS1374 watchdog device\n");
> > +	watchdog_unregister_device(drv_data->wdt);
> > +	unregister_reboot_notifier(&ds1374_wdt_notifier);
> > +
> 
> Call watchdog_stop_on_unregister() before calling
> watchdog_register_device().
> 
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ds1374_wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +	struct ds1374_wdt *drv_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&drv_data->mutex);
> > +	ds1374_wdt_stop(drv_data->wdt);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&drv_data->mutex);
> 
> Unnecessary and pointless.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct watchdog_ops ds1374_wdt_fops = {
> > +	.owner          = THIS_MODULE,
> > +	.start          = ds1374_wdt_start,
> > +	.stop           = ds1374_wdt_stop,
> > +	.ping           = ds1374_wdt_ping,
> > +	.set_timeout    = ds1374_wdt_settimeout,
> > +	.ioctl          = ds1374_wdt_ioctl,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct watchdog_device ds1374_wdd = {
> > +	.info           = &ds1374_wdt_info,
> > +	.ops            = &ds1374_wdt_fops,
> > +	.min_timeout    = TIMER_MARGIN_MIN,
> > +	.max_timeout    = TIMER_MARGIN_MAX,
> 
> .timeout should be set here.
> 
> Also, there can (at least in theory) be more than one ds1374 in the system. The
> code does not support this case. ds1374_wdd should be moved into struct
> ds1374_wdt.
> 
Thanks for good suggestion.
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver ds1374_wdt = {
> > +	.driver         = {
> > +		.owner  = THIS_MODULE,
> > +		.name   = DEVNAME,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe          = ds1374_wdt_probe,
> > +	.remove         = ds1374_wdt_remove,
> > +	.shutdown       = ds1374_wdt_shutdown,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver(ds1374_wdt);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Johnson Chen <johnsonch.chen@...a.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Dallas/Maxim DS1374 Watchdog Driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_ALIAS("Platform:ds1374_wdt");
> >

Best regards,
Johnson

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ