lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b7ee49c-9bee-a905-3497-e3addd8896b8@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:39:19 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/shuffle: don't move pages between zones and
 don't read garbage memmaps

> Hmm.. I thought this is the behavior for early section, while it looks current
> code doesn't work like this:
> 
>        if (section_is_early && memmap)
>                free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>        else
> 	       depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
> 
> section_is_early is always "true" for early section, while memmap is not-NULL
> only when sub-section map is empty.
> 
> If my understanding is correct, when we remove a sub-section in early section,
> the code would call depopulate_section_memmap(), which in turn free related
> memmap. By removing the memmap, the return value from pfn_to_online_page() is
> not a valid one.

I think you're right, and pfn_valid() would also return true, as it is
an early section. This looks broken.

> 
> Maybe we want to write the code like this:
> 
>        if (section_is_early)
>                if (memmap)
>                        free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>        else
> 	       depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
> 

I guess that should be the way to go

@Dan, I think what Wei proposes here is correct, right? Or how does it
work in the VMEMMAP case with early sections?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ