[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623090257.GA3743@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:02:57 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.darwish@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm: Break cyclic percpu include
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to use <asm/percpu.h> in irqflags.h, we need to make sure
> asm/percpu.h does not itself depend on irqflags.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> * in the TPIDRPRW. TPIDRPRW only exists on V6K and V7
> */
> #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_CPU_V6)
> +register unsigned long current_stack_pointer asm ("sp");
If you define this unconditionally, then we can probably get rid of the
copy in asm/thread_info.h, rather than duplicate the same #define.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists