linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net 0/3] net: ethtool: netdev_features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <JsL7L8OuXUs86d8IwlgSkHKgxaymF4ys_7cUQTMgPptaPdog6471ed5_BpUYUvoGNuSaHMs0ayvZ-P6-NQ0TvMGSyvu45J6NhuvJEHPxGsE=@pm.me>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:40:16 +0000
From:   Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "antoine.tenart@...tlin.com" <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        "steffen.klassert@...unet.com" <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        "ayal@...lanox.com" <ayal@...lanox.com>,
        "therbert@...gle.com" <therbert@...gle.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 0/3] net: ethtool: netdev_features_strings[] cleanup

Hi Dave, Michal,

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020, 2:34, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:55:50 +0000

> > This little series adds the last forgotten feature string for
> > NETIF_F_GSO_TUNNEL_REMCSUM and attempts to prevent such losses
> > in future.
> >
> > Patches 2-3 seem more like net-next candidates rather than net-fixes,
> > but for me it seems a bit more suitable to pull it during "quiet" RC
> > windows, so any new related code could start from this base.
> >
> > I was thinking about some kind of static assertion to have an early
> > prevention mechanism for this, but the existing of 2 intended holes
> > (former NO_CSUM and UFO) makes this problematic, at least at first
> > sight.
> >
> > v2:
> >  - fix the "Fixes:" tag in the first patch;
> >  - no functional changes.
>
> Please do not mix bug fixes (missing netdev feature strings, etc.) with
> cleanups (indentation changes).

You both are right, I should've thought better about that.
I'll split the series into two and resend, sorry.

> Thank you.

Thanks,
Al