linux-kernel - Re: linux-next build error (9)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANpmjNOeN=m5i-kEn-no5d3zUdAKv=gLidEENtgQCo5umNTSjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:09:06 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        syzbot <syzbot+dbf8cf3717c8ef4a90a0@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, joro@...tes.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, vkuznets@...hat.com,
        wanpengli@...cent.com, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next build error (9)

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 11:32, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:44:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:49:23 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > > Hurmph, I though that was cured in GCC >= 8. Marco?
> >
> > So what causes this? Because we got a couple of these in our s390 builds last night as well.
>
> This is KASAN's __no_sanitize_address function attribute. Some GCC
> versions are utterly wrecked when that function attribute is combined
> with inlining. It wants to have matching attributes for the function
> being inlined and function it is inlined into -- hence the function
> attribute mismatch.
>
> > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:805:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'look_up_lock_class': function attribute mismatch
> > include/linux/debug_locks.h:15:28: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline '__debug_locks_off': function attribute mismatch
> >
> > s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0 / GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.30
>
> *groan*... So supposedly it was supposed to work on GCC-8 and later, see
> commit 7b861a53e46b6. But now it turns out there's some later versions
> that fail too.
>
> I suppose the next quest is finding a s390 compiler version that works
> and then bumping the version test in the aforementioned commit.

 I'm trying to figure out by inspecting GCC changelogs which version
and which arch is actually good.

Thanks,
-- Marco