[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200623003013.26252-15-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:29:58 -0700
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/30] refperf: More closely synchronize reader start times
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Currently, readers are awakened individually. On most systems, this
results in significant wakeup delay from one reader to the next, which
can result in the first and last reader having sole access to the
synchronization primitive in question. If that synchronization primitive
involves shared memory, those readers will rack up a huge number of
operations in a very short time, causing large perturbations in the
results.
This commit therefore has the readers busy-wait after being awakened,
and uses a new n_started variable to synchronize their start times.
Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/refperf.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refperf.c b/kernel/rcu/refperf.c
index 2fd3ed1..234bb0e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refperf.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refperf.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static atomic_t nreaders_exp;
// Use to wait for all threads to start.
static atomic_t n_init;
+static atomic_t n_started;
// Track which experiment is currently running.
static int exp_idx;
@@ -253,6 +254,9 @@ ref_perf_reader(void *arg)
WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != me);
WRITE_ONCE(rt->start_reader, 0);
+ if (!atomic_dec_return(&n_started))
+ while (atomic_read_acquire(&n_started))
+ cpu_relax();
VERBOSE_PERFOUT("ref_perf_reader %ld: experiment %d started", me, exp_idx);
@@ -367,6 +371,7 @@ static int main_func(void *arg)
reset_readers();
atomic_set(&nreaders_exp, nreaders);
+ atomic_set(&n_started, nreaders);
exp_idx = exp;
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists