linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200623133559.GD2783@bug>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:35:59 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, dhavalp@...eaurora.org,
        mturney@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        Ravi Kumar Bokka <rbokka@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org,
        sparate@...eaurora.org, mkurumel@...eaurora.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

Hi!

> This patch adds support for blowing fuses to the qfprom driver if the
> required properties are defined in the device tree.

Should we have this in kernel?

If so, should we make it harder to use, like passing module parameter 
enabling this kind of support or something? Kconfig option as most users 
will not need this so this should be compiled out?

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html