lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624025135.GA1291930@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:51:35 -0700
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, axboe@...com, hch@....de,
        baolin.wang7@...il.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: Add Arbitration Burst support

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:34:08AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> OK, I understaood your concern. Now we will select the RR arbitration as default
> in nvme_enable_ctrl(), but for some cases, we will not set the arbitration burst
> values from userspace, and we still want to use the defaut arbitration burst that
> recommended by the controller, taking into consideration any latency requirements.
> 
> So I'd like to add a parameter to decide if we can use the default arbitration
> burst like below, how do yo think? Thanks.

I wouldn't call this the 'default' arbitration since it usually is not
the default. This is the 'recommended' arbitration value.
 
> static bool use_default_arb;
> module_param(use_default_arb, bool, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_default_arb, "use default arbitration burst that
> recommended by the controller");

"use controller's recommended arbitration burst"

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ