lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:20:42 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wait_on_page_bit_common(TASK_KILLABLE, EXCLUSIVE) can miss
 wakeup?

On 06/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Suppose that 2 threads T1 and T2 call __lock_page_killable() and sleep in
> wait_on_page_bit_common() -> io_schedule().
>
> T1 is killed, it does test_and_set_bit_lock() but the page is still locked.
>
> unlock_page() calls __wake_up_common(nr_exclusive = 1), this wakes T1 up.
> T2 is not woken.

Ah, please ignore me, sorry for noise.

If T1 is killed it is TASK_RUNNING, try_to_wake_up() should return 0.

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists