[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624174417.GM5472@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:44:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
agross@...nel.org, robdclark@...il.com, robdclark@...omium.org,
stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alok Chauhan <alokc@...eaurora.org>,
Akash Asthana <akashast@...eaurora.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
state
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:39:48AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:15:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Aren't there dependencies on earlier patches in the series?
> Not to my knowledge. Patch "[2/6] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use OPP API to set
> clk/perf state" depends on a change in 'include/linux/qcom-geni-se.h' made
> by "1/6] tty: serial: qcom_geni_serial: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state",
> however that's not true for this patch.
Wait, so *some* of the series should go together but not other bits?
But you want them split up for some reason?
> I wonder if it would have been better to split this series into individual
> patches/mini-series, to avoid this kind of confusion.
Yes, if there's no dependencies then bundling things up into a series
just causes confusion.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists