[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu4s8dy8.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:24:15 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: carlos <carlos@...hat.com>, Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] glibc: Perform rseq registration at C startup and thread creation (v21)
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
>> I think we should keep things simple on the glibc side for now and do
>> this changes to the kernel headers first.
>
> Just to be sure I understand what you mean by "keep things simple", do you
> recommend removing the following lines completely for now from sys/rseq.h ?
>
> /* Ensure the compiler supports rseq_align. */
> __rseq_static_assert (__rseq_alignof (struct rseq_cs) >= 32, "alignment");
> __rseq_static_assert (__rseq_alignof (struct rseq) >= 32, "alignment");
Yes, that's what I meant.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists