[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200624201226.21197-1-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:12:10 -0700
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/17] rcu: Fix a kernel-doc warnings for "count"
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
There are some kernel-doc warnings:
./kernel/rcu/tree.c:2915: warning: Function parameter or member 'count' not described in 'kfree_rcu_cpu'
This commit therefore moves the comment for "count" to the kernel-doc
markup.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c716ead..912d466 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2986,6 +2986,7 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work {
* @monitor_work: Promote @head to @head_free after KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES
* @monitor_todo: Tracks whether a @monitor_work delayed work is pending
* @initialized: The @lock and @rcu_work fields have been initialized
+ * @count: Number of objects for which GP not started
*
* This is a per-CPU structure. The reason that it is not included in
* the rcu_data structure is to permit this code to be extracted from
@@ -3001,7 +3002,6 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu {
struct delayed_work monitor_work;
bool monitor_todo;
bool initialized;
- // Number of objects for which GP not started
int count;
};
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists