lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:36:07 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH drivers/misc 0/4] lkdtm: Various clean ups

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more?
> > 
> >> True that, we can rip the file.
> > 
> > Has anyone fixed the uml build errors?
> 
> I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-)
> 
> Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it.
> Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream
> as soon more fixes queued up.

I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the
patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really
just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h?

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ