[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR0402MB3607491734698C7841884EF2FF950@AM6PR0402MB3607.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:46:24 +0000
From: Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx6plus: enable internal routing of
clk_enet_ref where possible
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:56 AM
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:40 PM Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com> wrote:
> >
> > The patch looks good.
> > Reviewed-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
>
> Thank you !
>
> To check we're on a plus, the patch uses:
> cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0
>
> Fabio Estevam suggested that perhaps checking
> of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6qp")
> might be preferable. What is your opinion on this?
Yes, I also think of_machine_is_compatible() is much better.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists