linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH drivers/misc 0/4] lkdtm: Various clean ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:23:05 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH drivers/misc 0/4] lkdtm: Various clean ups

On 6/24/20 3:01 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:29 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/24/20 1:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more?
>>>>>
>>>>>> True that, we can rip the file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone fixed the uml build errors?
>>>>
>>>> I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it.
>>>> Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream
>>>> as soon more fixes queued up.
>>>
>>> I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the
>>> patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really
>>> just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h?
>>>
>>
>> I just tried that and the build is still failing, so No, it's not that simple.
>>
>> But thanks for offering.
>>
>> I'll just ignore the UML build errors for now.
> 
> This is a allyesconfig?
> I just gave CONFIG_LKDTM=y a try, builds fine here.
> 

I'm building linux-next and it fails.

> But the desc.h in uml is still in vain and can be deleted AFAICT.


-- 
~Randy