[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159303797640.62212.15039388585433005717@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:32:56 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>, skrzynka@...radybcio.pl
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: qcom: smd: Add support for MSM8992/4 rpm clocks
Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2020-06-24 08:09:18)
> I should also note that for quite some time a hack [1]
> has been needed on some platforms for the RPMCC to register.
>
> This includes 8992/94, 8956/76 and possibly many more.
>
> With that commit, RPMCC registers fine.
>
What happens if that patch isn't applied? Does the system crash? Because
I'd rather not merge a patch in clk tree that causes the system to fail
to boot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists