[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624055552.GD684295@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:55:52 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/314] 5.4.49-rc1 review
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:14:21PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:53:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.49 release.
> > There are 314 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:52:30 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.49-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> I ran this through my LLVM build tests and saw no regressions compared
> to 5.4.47.
Great, thanks for testing!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists