[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624072927.GT128451@builder.lan>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:29:27 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
Cc: skrzynka@...radybcio.pl, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: Add SCM node
On Tue 23 Jun 16:30 PDT 2020, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >Shouldn't this be "qcom,scm-msm8992", "qcom,scm" ?
> >
> >(Or rather "qcom,scm-msm8994", "qcom,scm")
>
> Some DTs only have the SoC-specific one, and some also
> have the generic one. But I can add the generic one if
> you wish.
>
> I went with 8992, as I added it in the 8992 series
> (gonna update that one soon, too, so we can get it merged)
> and I didn't want to needlessly duplicate it. Ideally maybe we
> could switch to just qcom,scm for clockless SCM compats?
>
It's fairly common practice to specify both a specific and a generic
compatible, this would allow us to in the driver do special handling of
the specific in the future if we need to - without having to update the
devicetree.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists