[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200624092846.9194-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:58:44 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus
A Powerpc system with multiple possible nodes and with CONFIG_NUMA
enabled always used to have a node 0, even if node 0 does not any cpus
or memory attached to it. As per PAPR, node affinity of a cpu is only
available once its present / online. For all cpus that are possible but
not present, cpu_to_node() would point to node 0.
To ensure a cpuless, memoryless dummy node is not online, powerpc need
to make sure all possible but not present cpu_to_node are set to a
proper node.
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v4:->v5:
- rebased to v5.8-rc2
link v4: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200512132937.19295-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u
Changelog v3:->v4:
- Resolved comments from Christopher.
Link v3: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200501031128.19584-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u
Changelog v1:->v2:
- Rebased to v5.7-rc3
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index 9fcf2d195830..5b7918c132f5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -506,6 +506,11 @@ static int numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu)
int fcpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(lcpu);
int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ if (!cpu_present(lcpu)) {
+ set_cpu_numa_node(lcpu, first_online_node);
+ return first_online_node;
+ }
+
/*
* If a valid cpu-to-node mapping is already available, use it
* directly instead of querying the firmware, since it represents
@@ -931,8 +936,17 @@ void __init mem_topology_setup(void)
reset_numa_cpu_lookup_table();
- for_each_present_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ /*
+ * Powerpc with CONFIG_NUMA always used to have a node 0,
+ * even if it was memoryless or cpuless. For all cpus that
+ * are possible but not present, cpu_to_node() would point
+ * to node 0. To remove a cpuless, memoryless dummy node,
+ * powerpc need to make sure all possible but not present
+ * cpu_to_node are set to a proper node.
+ */
numa_setup_cpu(cpu);
+ }
}
void __init initmem_init(void)
--
2.18.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists