[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624102920.GB31972@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:59:21 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn
Hello Srikar,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:58:45PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Node id queried from the static device tree may not
> be correct. For example: it may always show 0 on a shared processor.
> Hence prefer the node id queried from vphn and fallback on the device tree
> based node id if vphn query fails.
>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists