[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0ace7a8-5c26-ee20-fe76-7dff57a18ca3@web.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:43:03 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] irqchip/csky-mpintc: Fix potential resource
leaks
> There exists potential resource leaks in the error path, fix them.
I suggest to improve this change description.
How do you think about another wording variant?
Specific system resources were not released in a few error cases.
Thus add jump targets for the completion of the desired exception handling.
…
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c
@@ -247,8 +247,10 @@ csky_mpintc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
…
INTCG_base = ioremap(mfcr("cr<31, 14>"),
INTCL_SIZE*nr_cpu_ids + INTCG_SIZE);
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=3e08a95294a4fb3702bb3d35ed08028433c37fe6#n257
…
+ if (INTCG_base == NULL) {
Would you like to use the following code variant?
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=3e08a95294a4fb3702bb3d35ed08028433c37fe6#n5756
+ if (!INTCG_base) {
…
> @@ -270,12 +274,22 @@ csky_mpintc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> ipi_irq = irq_create_mapping(root_domain, IPI_IRQ);
…
> + if (!ipi_irq) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto err_domain_remove;
> + }
…
Can the function call “irq_domain_remove(root_domain)” become relevant
only if the preprocessor symbol “CONFIG_SMP” was defined?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists