lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:43:03 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] irqchip/csky-mpintc: Fix potential resource
 leaks

> There exists potential resource leaks in the error path, fix them.

I suggest to improve this change description.
How do you think about another wording variant?

   Specific system resources were not released in a few error cases.
   Thus add jump targets for the completion of the desired exception handling.


…
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c
@@ -247,8 +247,10 @@ csky_mpintc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
…
 		INTCG_base = ioremap(mfcr("cr<31, 14>"),
 				     INTCL_SIZE*nr_cpu_ids + INTCG_SIZE);

See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=3e08a95294a4fb3702bb3d35ed08028433c37fe6#n257


…
+		if (INTCG_base == NULL) {


Would you like to use the following code variant?

See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=3e08a95294a4fb3702bb3d35ed08028433c37fe6#n5756

+		if (!INTCG_base) {


…
> @@ -270,12 +274,22 @@ csky_mpintc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	ipi_irq = irq_create_mapping(root_domain, IPI_IRQ);
…
> +	if (!ipi_irq) {
> +		ret = -EIO;
> +		goto err_domain_remove;
> +	}
…

Can the function call “irq_domain_remove(root_domain)” become relevant
only if the preprocessor symbol “CONFIG_SMP” was defined?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ