lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:48:31 +0800
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14 RESEND] irqchip: Fix potential resource leaks

On 06/24/2020 05:02 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 06/24/2020 04:30 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2020-06-24 08:44, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>> [git send-email failed due to too many commands,
>>>  so only cc the major related email and resend it,
>>>  sorry for that]
>>
>> This is becoming majorly annoying. Please fix your git setup
>> *before* dumping 57 emails for just 14 patches. You have done
>> the same thing yesterday, and I would hope you learned from your
>> mistakes.
>>
>> Also, do not repost a series more than once per week. You have
>> already exceeded your quota by quite a margin.
>
> I am very sorry for that.
> I will wait for some days to resend this patch series.

Hi Marc,

Since each patch of this series is independent, in order to avoid
git send-email failed, I prefer to resend each patch individually
and cc more related maintainer or supporter to review.

If you do not mind, I will resend each patch individually next week.
Sorry for the noisy and inconvenience.

>
>>
>>         M.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ