lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:49:23 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Move list.h inclusion into lockdep.h

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:43 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:28:58PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:

...

> > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>
> Unfortunately this doesn't work because list.h actually does need
> kernel.h for container_of.
>
> However, we can easily fix the loop another way by removing list.h
> from lockdep.h as it doesn't actually use any list macros/functions
> but only the list type which is now in linux/types.h.
>
> We could either fold this into the lockdep_types patch, or fold it
> into the printk patch, or just leave it as a standalone patch.
> What do you guys think?

Does lockdep_types include types? Then we are fine and it is the way to go.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ