[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB28227065EDF92A406A770ECBB3920@BYAPR12MB2822.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:32:25 +0000
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: Sachin Nikam <Snikam@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bhuntsman@...dia.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Yu-Huan Hsu <YHsu@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/4] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for Tegra194
SMMU
>> + - nvdia,tegra194-smmu-500
>The -500 suffix here seems a bit redundant since there's no other type of SMMU in Tegra194, correct?
Yeah, there is only one type of SMMU supported in T194. It was added to be synonymous with mmu-500. Can be removed.
-KR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists