[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200625231029.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:10:29 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: cumana_2: Fix different dev_id between
'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:47:30PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
> Use 'info' in both cases.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks Christophe.
> ---
> V2: update free_irq instead of request_irq in order not to obviously break
> code
> ---
> drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c
> index 65691c21f133..29294f0ef8a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int cumanascsi2_probe(struct expansion_card *ec,
>
> if (info->info.scsi.dma != NO_DMA)
> free_dma(info->info.scsi.dma);
> - free_irq(ec->irq, host);
> + free_irq(ec->irq, info);
>
> out_release:
> fas216_release(host);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists