linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: SVM: Rename svm_nested_virtualize_tpr() to nested_svm_virtualize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3d8aa359-a43c-a080-5d62-3bf1300e1ee1@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:28:21 -0700
From:   Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: SVM: Rename svm_nested_virtualize_tpr() to
 nested_svm_virtualize_tpr()


On 6/25/20 1:03 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>
> Match the naming with other nested svm functions.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 +++---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index e0b0321d95d4..b0d551bcf2a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3040,7 +3040,7 @@ static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr)
>   {
>   	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>   
> -	if (svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
> +	if (nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
>   		return;
>   
>   	clr_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE);
> @@ -3234,7 +3234,7 @@ static inline void sync_cr8_to_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>   
> -	if (svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
> +	if (nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
>   		return;
>   
>   	if (!is_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE)) {
> @@ -3248,7 +3248,7 @@ static inline void sync_lapic_to_cr8(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>   	u64 cr8;
>   
> -	if (svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(vcpu) ||
> +	if (nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(vcpu) ||
>   	    kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
>   		return;
>   
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> index 003e89008331..8907efda0b0a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ void svm_set_gif(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool value);
>   #define NESTED_EXIT_DONE	1	/* Exit caused nested vmexit  */
>   #define NESTED_EXIT_CONTINUE	2	/* Further checks needed      */
>   
> -static inline bool svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline bool nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>   
Should the name be changed to svm_nested_virtualized_tpr ?  Because 
svm_nested_virtualize_tpr implies that the action of the function is to 
virtualize the TPR.