[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200625055140.GA2141@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:51:40 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2.1] x86/msr: Filter MSR writes
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Here's an improved v2 with sparse warnings fixed:
>
> ---
> Disable writing to MSRs from userspace by default. Writes can still be
> allowed by supplying the allow_writes=1 module parameter and the kernel
> will be tainted so that it shows in oopses.
>
> Having unfettered access to all MSRs on a system is and has always been
> a disaster waiting to happen. Think performance counter MSRs, MSRs with
> sticky or locked bits, MSRs making major system changes like loading
> microcode, MTRRs, PAT configuration, TSC counter, security mitigations
> MSRs, you name it.
>
> This also destroys all the kernel's caching of MSR values for
> performance, as the recent case with MSR_AMD64_LS_CFG showed.
>
> Another example is writing MSRs by mistake by simply typing the wrong
> MSR address. System freezes have been experienced that way.
>
> In general, poking at MSRs under the kernel's feet is a bad bad idea.
>
> So disable poking directly at the MSRs by default. If userspace still
> wants to do that, then proper interfaces should be defined which
> are under the kernel's control and accesses to those MSRs can be
> synchronized and sanitized properly.
>
> Changelog:
> - taint before WRMSR, all
> - make param 0600, Sean.
> - do not deny but log writes by default, Linus.
>
> [ Fix sparse warnings ]
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
A few non-functional nits below.
Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/msr.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> index 1547be359d7f..576c43e39247 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,14 @@
> static struct class *msr_class;
> static enum cpuhp_state cpuhp_msr_state;
>
> +enum allow_write_msrs {
> + MSR_WRITES_ON,
> + MSR_WRITES_OFF,
> + MSR_WRITES_DEFAULT,
> +};
> +
> +static enum allow_write_msrs allow_writes = MSR_WRITES_DEFAULT;
> +
> static ssize_t msr_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> @@ -70,6 +78,24 @@ static ssize_t msr_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> return bytes ? bytes : err;
> }
>
> +static int filter_write(u32 reg)
> +{
> + switch (allow_writes) {
> + case MSR_WRITES_ON: return 0; break;
> + case MSR_WRITES_OFF: return -EPERM; break;
The breaks after the returns are unnecessary.
> + default: break;
> + }
> +
> + if (reg == MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS)
> + return 0;
> +
> + pr_err_ratelimited("Write to unrecognized MSR 0x%x by %s\n"
> + "Please report to x86@...nel.org\n",
> + reg, current->comm);
Maybe s/unrecognized/unauthorized? Unrecognized implies the kernel doesn't
know anything about the MSR being written, which may not hold true.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t msr_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> @@ -84,6 +110,10 @@ static ssize_t msr_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + err = filter_write(reg);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> if (count % 8)
> return -EINVAL; /* Invalid chunk size */
>
> @@ -92,9 +122,13 @@ static ssize_t msr_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> err = -EFAULT;
> break;
> }
> +
> + add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> +
> err = wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(cpu, reg, data[0], data[1]);
> if (err)
> break;
> +
Random leftover whitespace change.
> tmp += 2;
> bytes += 8;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists