linux-kernel - Re: ath9k broken [was: Linux 5.7.3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEJqkgj4LS7M3zYK51Vagt4rWC9A7uunA+7CvX0Qv=57Or3Ngg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:52:21 +0200
From:   Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
        angrypenguinpoland@...il.com, Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com>,
        ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k broken [was: Linux 5.7.3]

Am Do., 25. Juni 2020 um 12:48 Uhr schrieb Gabriel C
<nix.or.die@...glemail.com>:
>
> Am Do., 25. Juni 2020 um 06:57 Uhr schrieb Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>:
> >
> > On 25. 06. 20, 0:05, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 18:13 Uhr schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
> > >>
> > >> I'm announcing the release of the 5.7.3 kernel.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hello Greg,
> > >
> > >> Qiujun Huang (5):
> > >>       ath9k: Fix use-after-free Read in htc_connect_service
> > >>       ath9k: Fix use-after-free Read in ath9k_wmi_ctrl_rx
> > >>       ath9k: Fix use-after-free Write in ath9k_htc_rx_msg
> > >>       ath9x: Fix stack-out-of-bounds Write in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb
> > >>       ath9k: Fix general protection fault in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb
> > >>
> > >
> > > We got a report on IRC about 5.7.3+ breaking a USB ath9k Wifi Dongle,
> > > while working fine on <5.7.3.
> > >
> > > I don't have myself such HW, and the reported doesn't have any experience
> > > in bisecting the kernel, so we build kernels, each with one of the
> > > above commits reverted,
> > > to find the bad commit.
> > >
> > > The winner is:
> > >
> > > commit 6602f080cb28745259e2fab1a4cf55eeb5894f93
> > > Author: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com>
> > > Date:   Sat Apr 4 12:18:38 2020 +0800
> > >
> > >     ath9k: Fix general protection fault in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb
> > >
> > >     commit 2bbcaaee1fcbd83272e29f31e2bb7e70d8c49e05 upstream.
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Reverting this one fixed his problem.
> >
> > Obvious question: is 5.8-rc1 (containing the commit) broken too?
>
> Yes, it does, just checked.
>
> git tag --contains 2bbcaaee1fcbd83272e29f31e2bb7e70d8c49e05
> v5.8-rc1
> v5.8-rc2
>

Sorry, I read the wrong, I just woke up.

We didn't test 5.8-rc{1,2} yet but we will today and let you know.

> >
> > I fail to see how the commit could cause an issue like this. Is this
> > really reproducibly broken with the commit and irreproducible without
> > it?
>
> I can't see something obvious wrong either, but yes it's reproducible on his HW.
> Kernel with this commit breaks the dongle, with the commit reverted it works.
>
> >As it looks like a USB/wiring problem:
> > usb 1-2: USB disconnect, device number 2
> > ath: phy0: Reading Magic # failed
> > ath: phy0: Unable to initialize hardware; initialization status: -5
> > ...
> > usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -110
> > usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> >
> > Ccing ath9k maintainers too.
> >
> > > I don't have so much info about the HW, besides a dmesg showing the
> > > phy breaking.
> > > I also added the reporter to CC too.
> > >
> > > https://gist.github.com/AngryPenguinPL/1e545f0da3c2339e443b9e5044fcccea
> > >
> > > If you need more info, please let me know and I'll try my best to get
> > > it as fast as possible for you.
> >
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Gabriel C