[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d9d5692-b603-19eb-3f69-c18cfef7b450@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:59:06 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] iommu/uapi: Support both kernel and user unbind
guest PASID
Hi Jacob,
On 2020/6/24 1:03, Jacob Pan wrote:
> +int __iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> + struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> {
> if (unlikely(!domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - return domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid(dev, pasid);
> + return domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid(dev, data->hpasid);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid);
__iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid() looks more like an internal only helper. How
about something like iommu_sva_kunbind_gpasid()?
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists