linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] mfd: wm8350-core: Supply description wm8350_reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200625072449.4d3e3fca@lwn.net>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:24:49 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] mfd: wm8350-core: Supply description
 wm8350_reg_{un}lock args

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:13:13 +0100
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> > Why are all of these documentation fixes for stable?  
> 
> Because they fix compiler warnings.
> 
> Not correct?

I am overjoyed to see people fixing docs build warnings, it is work that
is desperately needed.  That said, these warning fixes are probably not
stable material; the problem is bigger and longer-term than that.

Thanks,

jon