[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200625164939.GF20319@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:49:39 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 03/21] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:34:31AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> However, building and running enclaves is complex, and the vast majority of
> SGX enabled applications are expected to leverage a library of one kind or
> another to hand the bulk of the gory details.
I gotta say this rings a bell: dhansen alluded on IRC to the jumping
through hoops one needs to do in order to run SGX enclaves.
...
> The vDSO stuff is in patches 15-18 of this series.
>
> There's a gigantic thread on all the alternatives that were considered[2].
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrXByb2UVuZ6AXUeOd8y90NAikbZuvdN3wf_TjHZ+CxNhA@mail.gmail.com
> [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrWdpoDkbZjkucKL91GWpDPG9p=VqYrULade2pFDR7S=GQ@mail.gmail.com
Yeah, that makes it very clear. Thanks a lot for taking the time and
writing it down. I've snipped it for brevity but it is very useful!
Thx!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists