[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjftajgfy6.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:26:09 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/17] arm64: Remove custom IRQ stat accounting
On 24/06/20 20:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> @@ -801,26 +802,15 @@ void show_ipi_list(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
> unsigned int cpu, i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_IPI; i++) {
> + unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(ipi_desc[i]);
> seq_printf(p, "%*s%u:%s", prec - 1, "IPI", i,
> prec >= 4 ? " " : "");
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> - seq_printf(p, "%10u ",
> - __get_irq_stat(cpu, ipi_irqs[i]));
> + seq_printf(p, "%10u ", kstat_irqs_cpu(irq, cpu));
> seq_printf(p, " %s\n", ipi_types[i]);
How attached are we to that custom IPI printout? AIUI we *could* give them
a "prettier" name in request_percpu_irq() and let the standard procfs
printout take the wheel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists