linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] regulator: da9063-regulator: Fix .suspend 'initialized field overwritten' warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200625184316.GW954398@dell>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:43:16 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] regulator: da9063-regulator: Fix .suspend
 'initialized field overwritten' warnings

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Looks as though 9f75ce666199 ("regulator: da9063: fix suspend") failed
> 
> $ git show 9f75ce666199
> fatal: ambiguous argument '9f75ce666199': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> 
> You should probably CC this to the authors of that commit - a similar
> thing applies to several of the other patches here.  You probably don't
> want to CC everyone on everything but OTOH there isn't really any need
> for things to be bundled up in a series anyway.

Sounds fair.  Will Cc important people on individual patches.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog