[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200625150922.08abe7e6@oasis.local.home>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:09:22 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Yordan Karadzhov <y.karadz@...il.com>,
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Jason Behmer <jbehmer@...gle.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
bristot <bristot@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...are.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Suresh E. Warrier" <warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ring-buffer: Have nested events still record
running time stamp
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:55:07 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> What are the types used for before_stamp and write_stamp ? If those
> are 64-bit integers, how does sharing them between nested contexts
> work on 32-bit architectures ?
BTW, I forgot to state in either of my two emails, THANK YOU!
I really appreciate the thorough review of this patch, and I welcome
the challenges you give me to make sure I can verify all that I claim
can happen.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists