[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRQru30WtA-CMeqq=0GBtZ-Ut20ecHwpYfbEu5qCFqgDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:14:34 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, sgrubb@...hat.com,
rgb@...hat.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:25 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
<nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/23/20 12:58 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> Hi Steve\Paul,
>
> >> Sample audit messages:
> >>
> >> [ 6.303048] audit: type=1804 audit(1592506281.627:2): pid=1 uid=0
> >> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=measuring_key
> >> cause=ENOMEM comm="swapper/0" name=".builtin_trusted_keys" res=0
> >> errno=-12
> >
> > My only concern is that auditing -ENOMEM will put additional memory
> > pressure on the system. I'm not sure if this is a concern and, if so,
> > how it should be handled.
>
> Do you have any concerns with respect to adding audit messages in low
> memory conditions?
Assuming the system is not completely toast, the allocation failure
could be a very transient issue; I wouldn't worry too much about it.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists