Message-ID: <CAFd5g45x04Q+r+1M+kwqkp1DsY9PjJN+Gs0Q+MkOdYTz0SdzKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:10:33 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will@...nel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        paulus@...ba.org, chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch
 all KUnit tests

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:47 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Glad this is back out there: a couple of minor nitpicks below:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 4:58 AM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > ## TL;DR
> >
> > This patchset adds a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than
> > relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately along
> > with a couple of new features that depend on it.
> >
> > Also, sorry for the extreme delay in getting this out. Part of the delay
> > came from finding that there were actually several architectures that
> > the previous revision of this patchset didn't work on, so I went through
> > and attempted to test this patchset on every architecture - more on that
> > later.
> >
> > ## What am I trying to do?
> >
> > Conceptually, I am trying to provide a mechanism by which test suites
> > can be grouped together so that they can be reasoned about collectively.
> > The last two of three patches in this series add features which depend
> > on this:
> >
> > PATCH 8/11 Prints out a test plan[1] right before KUnit tests are run;
> >            this is valuable because it makes it possible for a test
> >            harness to detect whether the number of tests run matches the
> >            number of tests expected to be run, ensuring that no tests
> >            silently failed. The test plan includes a count of tests that
> >            will run. With the centralized executor, the tests are
> >            located in a single data structure and thus can be counted.
> >
>
> This appears to actually be patch 9/11.
>
> > PATCH 9/11 Add a new kernel command-line option which allows the user to
> >            specify that the kernel poweroff, halt, or reboot after
> >            completing all KUnit tests; this is very handy for running
> >            KUnit tests on UML or a VM so that the UML/VM process exits
> >            cleanly immediately after running all tests without needing a
> >            special initramfs. The centralized executor provides a
> >            definitive point when all tests have completed and the
> >            poweroff, halt, or reboot could occur.
>
> This seems to have been merged into the above patch (9/11).

Whoops, good catch.

Fixed in v5!

> > In addition, by dispatching tests from a single location, we can
> > guarantee that all KUnit tests run after late_init is complete, which
> > was a concern during the initial KUnit patchset review (this has not
> > been a problem in practice, but resolving with certainty is nevertheless
> > desirable).
> >
> > Other use cases for this exist, but the above features should provide an
> > idea of the value that this could provide.
> >
> > ## Changes since last revision:
> >  - On the last revision I got some messages from 0day that showed that
> >    this patchset didn't work on several architectures, one issue that
> >    this patchset addresses is that we were aligning both memory segments
> >    as well as structures in the segments to specific byte boundaries
> >    which was incorrect.
> >  - The issue mentioned above also caused me to test on additional
> >    architectures which revealed that some architectures other than UML
> >    do not use the default init linker section macro that most
> >    architectures use. There are now several new patches (2, 3, 4, and
> >    6).
> >  - Fixed a formatting consistency issue in the kernel params
> >    documentation patch (9/9).
> >  - Add a brief blurb on how and when the kunit_test_suite macro works.
> >
> > ## Remaining work to be done:
> >
> > The only architecture for which I was able to get a compiler, but was
> > apparently unable to get KUnit into a section that the executor to see
> > was m68k - not sure why.
> >
> > Alan Maguire (1):
> >   kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests
> >
> > Brendan Higgins (10):
> >   vmlinux.lds.h: add linker section for KUnit test suites
> >   arch: arm64: add linker section for KUnit test suites
> >   arch: microblaze: add linker section for KUnit test suites
> >   arch: powerpc: add linker section for KUnit test suites
> >   arch: um: add linker section for KUnit test suites
> >   arch: xtensa: add linker section for KUnit test suites
> >   init: main: add KUnit to kernel init
> >   kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format
> >   Documentation: Add kunit_shutdown to kernel-parameters.txt
> >   Documentation: kunit: add a brief blurb about kunit_test_suite
> >
> >  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   8 ++
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst       |   5 ++
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S               |   3 +
> >  arch/microblaze/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S          |   4 +
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S             |   4 +
> >  arch/um/include/asm/common.lds.S              |   4 +
> >  arch/xtensa/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S              |   4 +
> >  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h             |   8 ++
> >  include/kunit/test.h                          |  73 ++++++++++++-----
> >  init/main.c                                   |   4 +
> >  lib/kunit/Makefile                            |   3 +-
> >  lib/kunit/executor.c                          |  63 +++++++++++++++
> >  lib/kunit/test.c                              |  13 +--
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py           |   2 +-
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py           |  74 +++++++++++++++---
> >  .../test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log        | Bin 1562 -> 1567 bytes
> >  .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log   | Bin 3016 -> 3021 bytes
> >  .../test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log | Bin 1700 -> 1705 bytes
> >  18 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 4333a9b0b67bb4e8bcd91bdd80da80b0ec151162
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 2d4b5aa9fa8ada9ae04c8584b47c299a822b9455
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 582b6d9d28ce4b71628890ec832df6522ca68de0
> >
> > These patches are available for download with dependencies here:
> >
> > https://kunit-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/+/3829
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md#the-plan
> > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11383635/
> >
> > --
> > 2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists