[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVMs4Ok3=gYmzheNTzbBUGGHbCr0cpJSm9TV45aeZb4Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:44:14 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] perf tools: Add support to reuse metric
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:25 PM Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:47:10PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in another
> > metric. The metric needs to be referenced by 'metric:' prefix.
>
> Why is the prefix needed?
>
> Could just look it up without prefix.
The name could be a metric or an event, the logic for each is quite
different. You could look up an event and when it fails assume it was
a metric, but I like the simplicity of this approach. Maybe this
change could be adopted more widely with something like "perf stat -e
metric:IPC -a -I 1000" rather than the current "perf stat -M IPC -a -I
1000".
Thanks,
Ian
> -Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists