[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22595721-02ef-5a18-a8d1-4ff13e475556@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:04:44 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To: B K Karthik <bkkarthik@...u.pes.edu>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: media: soc_camera: Adding parentheses to
macro defination at line 241, Clearing alignment issues at lines 410 and
1270, fixing return values at EPOLLERR
The soc_camera driver obsolete and depends on BROKEN. And in fact, I'm
working on removing it. So I'll drop this patch for those reasons.
Regards,
Hans
On 25/06/2020 17:35, B K Karthik wrote:
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses" in line 241 by adding parentheses.
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "Alignment should match open parenthesis" by adding tab spaces in line 410.
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "return of an errno should typically be negative" by adding a "-" in front of EPOLLER in line 812.
> staging: media: soc_camera: soc_camera.c: Clearing coding-style problem
> "Alignment should match open parenthesis" by adding tab spaces in line 1270.
>
> Signed-off-by: B K Karthik <karthik.bk2000@...e.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c b/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> index 39f513f69b89..66a14ebd8093 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -238,8 +238,8 @@ unsigned long soc_camera_apply_board_flags(struct soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_apply_board_flags);
>
> -#define pixfmtstr(x) (x) & 0xff, ((x) >> 8) & 0xff, ((x) >> 16) & 0xff, \
> - ((x) >> 24) & 0xff
> +#define pixfmtstr(x) ((x) & 0xff, ((x) >> 8) & 0xff, ((x) >> 16) & 0xff, \
> + ((x) >> 24) & 0xff)
>
> static int soc_camera_try_fmt(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
> struct v4l2_format *f)
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int soc_camera_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv,
> }
>
> static int soc_camera_create_bufs(struct file *file, void *priv,
> - struct v4l2_create_buffers *create)
> + struct v4l2_create_buffers *create)
> {
> struct soc_camera_device *icd = file->private_data;
> int ret;
> @@ -806,10 +806,10 @@ static __poll_t soc_camera_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *pt)
> {
> struct soc_camera_device *icd = file->private_data;
> struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> - __poll_t res = EPOLLERR;
> + __poll_t res = -EPOLLERR;
>
> if (icd->streamer != file)
> - return EPOLLERR;
> + return -EPOLLERR;
>
> mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> res = ici->ops->poll(file, pt);
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static int soc_camera_i2c_init(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
> }
>
> subdev = v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board(&ici->v4l2_dev, adap,
> - shd->board_info, NULL);
> + shd->board_info, NULL);
> if (!subdev) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto ei2cnd;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists