[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e14df05-8299-52d6-df8f-0dd476f4109d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:17:21 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Tegra Video Decoder driver power management
corrections
24.06.2020 18:23, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 24.06.2020 18:16, Hans Verkuil пишет:
>> On 24/06/2020 17:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This small series addresses a Runtime PM issue that was discovered during
>>> of Tegra VI driver reviewing by balancing RPM usage count on RPM resume
>>> failure. Secondly it fixes reboot on some Tegra devices due to bootloader
>>> expecting VDE power partition to be ON at the boot time, which wasn't
>>> happening in case of a warm re-booting (i.e. by PMC resetting).
>>
>> Can you rebase this on top of the media_tree master branch? I think a variant
>> of patch 1 has already been applied. I found a mail today where you mentioned
>> that you preferred your version (it looks like I missed that) so you'll need to
>> rework patch 1.
>
> Hello Hans,
>
> I'll take a look at what patches has been applied, my bad for sending
> the v2 too late. Thank you for the heads up!
>
I tested the already-applied variant of the patch 1 and it has the same
behaviour as my variant, so it's okay.
Would you want me to send a v3 without the conflicting patch 1 or you
could apply the patches 2-4 from this series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists