[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69be7e39936ced4501107aeff6a93ca930e62f49.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:38:13 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] reset: intel: fix a compile warning about REG_OFFSET
redefined
Hi Dejin,
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 23:30 +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> kernel test robot reports a compile warning about REG_OFFSET redefined
> in the reset-intel-gw.c after merging commit e44ab4e14d6f4 ("regmap:
> Simplify implementation of the regmap_read_poll_timeout() macro"). the
> warning is like that:
>
> drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c:18:0: warning: "REG_OFFSET" redefined
> #define REG_OFFSET GENMASK(31, 16)
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/hardware.h:30:0,
> from ./arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h:15,
> from ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:198,
> from ./include/linux/io.h:13,
> from ./include/linux/iopoll.h:14,
> from ./include/linux/regmap.h:20,
> from drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c:12:
> ./arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/platform.h:25:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> #define REG_OFFSET 3
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Fixes: e44ab4e14d6f4 ("regmap: Simplify implementation of the regmap_read_poll_timeout() macro")
Hm, shouldn't this rather be:
Fixes: c9aef213e38c ("reset: intel: Add system reset controller driver")
even though e44ab4e14d6f4 triggered the issue by including iopoll.h?
> Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c b/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c
> index 854238444616..5cfb4892b399 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-intel-gw.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #define RCU_RST_STAT 0x0024
> #define RCU_RST_REQ 0x0048
>
> -#define REG_OFFSET GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define REG_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> #define BIT_OFFSET GENMASK(15, 8)
> #define STAT_BIT_OFFSET GENMASK(7, 0)
Could you add the _MASK suffix to BIT_OFFSET and STAT_BIT_OFFSET as
well, for consistency?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists