linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 023/206] PCI: aardvark: Dont blindly enable ASPM L0s and dont write to read-only register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200626125350.GA29985@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:53:50 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn505@...il.com>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 023/206] PCI: aardvark: Dont blindly enable ASPM L0s
 and dont write to read-only register

Hi!

> [ Upstream commit 90c6cb4a355e7befcb557d217d1d8b8bd5875a05 ]
> 
> Trying to change Link Status register does not have any effect as this
> is a read-only register. Trying to overwrite bits for Negotiated Link
> Width does not make sense.

I don't quite get it. This says register is read only...

> In future proper change of link width can be done via Lane Count Select
> bits in PCIe Control 0 register.
> 
> Trying to unconditionally enable ASPM L0s via ASPM Control bits in Link
> Control register is wrong. There should be at least some detection if
> endpoint supports L0s as isn't mandatory.

....and this says it is wrong to set the bits as ASPM L0 is not
mandatory.

> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> @@ -321,10 +321,6 @@ static void advk_pcie_setup_hw(struct advk_pcie *pcie)
>  
>  	advk_pcie_wait_for_link(pcie);
>  
> -	reg = PCIE_CORE_LINK_L0S_ENTRY |
> -		(1 << PCIE_CORE_LINK_WIDTH_SHIFT);
> -	advk_writel(pcie, reg, PCIE_CORE_LINK_CTRL_STAT_REG);
> -
>  	reg = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_CMD_STATUS_REG);
>  	reg |= PCIE_CORE_CMD_MEM_ACCESS_EN |
>  		PCIE_CORE_CMD_IO_ACCESS_EN |

...but we only do single write.

So which is it?

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)