[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve2x9dEqaHSue5UAftsJw+U3n8K9YEXBy5QFGJHgkQ3DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 16:23:47 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/32] linux/bits.h: fix unsigned less than zero warnings
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:37 PM Rikard Falkeborn
<rikard.falkeborn@...il.com> wrote:
> Den fre 26 juni 2020 08:32Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> skrev:
...
> I'll just say no and point to this email next time someone complains instead.
"No" is not constructive here. People can be annoyed with warning
messages, but the real issue here are the various CI systems which
send a lot of spam because of that. As a maintainer I would need to
drop CI in order to see a good patch. If Linus considers that warning
useless, then probably you can change your patch to do what he
proposed.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists