[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1379e21d-c51a-3710-e185-c2d7a9681fb7@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:07:51 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...i.sm>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...i.sm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release
On 2020-06-25 01:16, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> here's roughly what happens when enabling runtime PM in sysfs (again,
> because sd_probe() calls autopm_put() and thus allows it:
>
> [ 27.384446] sd 0:0:0:0: scsi_runtime_suspend
> [ 27.432282] blk_pre_runtime_suspend
> [ 27.435783] sd_suspend_common
> [ 27.438782] blk_post_runtime_suspend
> [ 27.442427] scsi target0:0:0: scsi_runtime_suspend
> [ 27.447303] scsi host0: scsi_runtime_suspend
>
> then I "mount /dev/sda1 /mnt" and none of the resume() functions get
> called. To me it looks like the sd driver should initiate resuming, and
> that's not implemented.
>
> what am I doing wrong or overlooking? how exactly does (or should) the
> block layer initiate resume here?
As far as I know runtime power management support in the sd driver is working
fine and is being used intensively by the UFS driver. The following commit was
submitted to fix a bug encountered by an UFS developer: 05d18ae1cc8a ("scsi:
pm: Balance pm_only counter of request queue during system resume") # v5.7.
I'm not sure which bug is causing trouble on your setup but I think it's likely
that the root cause is somewhere else than in the block layer, the SCSI core
or the SCSI sd driver.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists