[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200626160419.GA9302@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:04:19 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, talho@...dia.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bbasu@...dia.com,
mperttunen@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [TEGRA194_CPUFREQ PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: Add t194
ccplex compatible and bpmp property
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:13:53PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> To do frequency scaling on all CPUs within T194 CPU Complex, we need
> to query BPMP for data on valid operating points. Document a compatible
> string under 'cpus' node to represent the CPU Complex for binding drivers
> like cpufreq which don't have their node or CPU Complex node to bind to.
> Also, document a property to point to the BPMP device that can be queried
> for all CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> index a018147..737b55e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ properties:
> - nvidia,tegra132-denver
> - nvidia,tegra186-denver
> - nvidia,tegra194-carmel
> + - nvidia,tegra194-ccplex
> - qcom,krait
> - qcom,kryo
> - qcom,kryo260
> @@ -255,6 +256,14 @@ properties:
>
> where voltage is in V, frequency is in MHz.
>
> + nvidia,bpmp:
> + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle'
> + descrption: |
> + Specifies the bpmp node that needs to be queried to get
> + operating point data for all CPUs.
> +
> + Optional for NVIDIA Tegra194 Carmel CPUs
Hi,
The code (next patches) suggests, that the property is relevant for Tegra194
only. If it is required for compatible=tegra194-ccplex, then maybe you can
mark it so (there is already similar constraint described in the file, just
before the example section).
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
Powered by blists - more mailing lists