Message-ID: <20200627101738.2fe4abc3@aktux>
Date:   Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:17:38 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, allen <allen.chen@....com.tw>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Josua Mayer <josua.mayer@....eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/10] mfd: Add base driver for Netronix embedded
 controller

On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:42:15 +0200
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net> wrote:

> Third-party hardware documentation is available at
> https://github.com/neuschaefer/linux/wiki/Netronix-MSP430-embedded-controller
> 
> The EC supports interrupts, but the driver doesn't make use of them so
> far.
> 
> Known problems:
> - The reboot handler is installed in such a way that it directly calls
>   into the i2c subsystem to send the reboot command to the EC. This
>   means that the reboot handler may sleep, which is not allowed.
> 
see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20190415213432.8972-3-contact@stefanchrist.eu/

for a fix of such problems. 

> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |   7 ++
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   1 +
>  drivers/mfd/ntxec.c       | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/ntxec.h |  30 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/ntxec.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/ntxec.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index a37d7d1713820..78410b928648e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -978,6 +978,13 @@ config MFD_VIPERBOARD
>  	  You need to select the mfd cell drivers separately.
>  	  The drivers do not support all features the board exposes.
> 
> +config MFD_NTXEC
> +	bool "Netronix Embedded Controller"
> +	depends on I2C && OF
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here if you want to support the embedded controller of
> +	  certain e-book readers designed by the ODM Netronix.
> +
>  config MFD_RETU
>  	tristate "Nokia Retu and Tahvo multi-function device"
>  	select MFD_CORE
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index 9367a92f795a6..19d9391ed6f32 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_INTEL_MSIC)	+= intel_msic.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT)	+= intel_pmc_bxt.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_PALMAS)	+= palmas.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_VIPERBOARD)    += viperboard.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_NTXEC)		+= ntxec.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_RC5T583)	+= rc5t583.o rc5t583-irq.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_RK808)		+= rk808.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_RN5T618)	+= rn5t618.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ntxec.c b/drivers/mfd/ntxec.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..82adea34ea746
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ntxec.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +// Copyright 2020 Jonathan Neuschäfer
> +//
> +// MFD driver for the usually MSP430-based embedded controller used in certain
> +// Netronix ebook reader board designs
> +
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/ntxec.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pm.h>
> +#include <linux/reboot.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +
> +#define NTXEC_VERSION		0x00
> +#define NTXEC_POWEROFF		0x50
> +#define NTXEC_POWERKEEP		0x70
> +#define NTXEC_RESET		0x90
> +
> +
> +/* Register access */
> +
> +int ntxec_read16(struct ntxec *ec, u8 addr)
> +{
> +	u8 request[1] = { addr };
> +	u8 response[2];
> +	int res;
> +
> +	struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
> +		{
> +			.addr = ec->client->addr,
> +			.flags = ec->client->flags,
> +			.len = sizeof(request),
> +			.buf = request
> +		}, {
> +			.addr = ec->client->addr,
> +			.flags = ec->client->flags | I2C_M_RD,
> +			.len = sizeof(response),
> +			.buf = response
> +		}
> +	};
> +
> +	res = i2c_transfer(ec->client->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs));
> +	if (res < 0)
> +		return res;
> +	if (res != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	return get_unaligned_be16(response);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ntxec_read16);
> +
> +int ntxec_write16(struct ntxec *ec, u8 addr, u16 value)
> +{
> +	u8 request[3] = { addr, };
> +	int res;
> +
> +	put_unaligned_be16(value, request + 1);
> +
> +	res = i2c_transfer_buffer_flags(ec->client, request, sizeof(request),
> +					ec->client->flags);
> +	if (res < 0)
> +		return res;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ntxec_write16);
> +
> +int ntxec_read8(struct ntxec *ec, u8 addr)
> +{
> +	int res = ntxec_read16(ec, addr);
> +
> +	if (res < 0)
> +		return res;
> +
> +	return (res >> 8) & 0xff;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ntxec_read8);
> +
> +int ntxec_write8(struct ntxec *ec, u8 addr, u8 value)
> +{
> +	return ntxec_write16(ec, addr, value << 8);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ntxec_write8);
> +

do we really need both 16bit and 8bit accessors? If not,
then simply use regmap_i2c_init and set val_bits accordingly.
Maybe just doing the << 8 in the constants?

> +
> +/* Reboot/poweroff handling */
> +
> +static struct ntxec *poweroff_restart_instance;
> +
> +static void ntxec_poweroff(void)
> +{
> +	ntxec_write8(poweroff_restart_instance, NTXEC_POWEROFF, 0x01);
> +	msleep(5000);
> +}
> +
> +static int ntxec_restart(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +		unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> +	/* FIXME: The I2C driver sleeps, but restart handlers may not sleep */
> +	ntxec_write8(poweroff_restart_instance, NTXEC_RESET, 0xff);
> +	/* TODO: delay? */
> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block ntxec_restart_handler = {
> +	.notifier_call = ntxec_restart,
> +	.priority = 128
> +};
> +
> +
> +/* Driver setup */
> +
> +static int ntxec_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +			    const struct i2c_device_id *ids)
> +{
> +	struct ntxec *ec;
> +	int res;
> +
> +	ec = devm_kmalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ec)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ec->dev = &client->dev;
> +	ec->client = client;
> +
> +	/* Determine the firmware version */
> +	res = ntxec_read16(ec, NTXEC_VERSION);
> +	if (res < 0) {
> +		dev_dbg(ec->dev, "Failed to read firmware version number\n");
> +		return res;
> +	}
> +	ec->version = res;
> +
> +	dev_info(ec->dev,
> +		 "Netronix embedded controller version %04x detected.\n",
> +		 ec->version);
> +
> +	/* For now, we don't support the new register layout. */
> +	if (ntxec_has_new_layout(ec))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(ec->dev->of_node)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Set the 'powerkeep' bit. This is necessary on some boards
> +		 * in order to keep the system running.
> +		 */
> +		res = ntxec_write8(ec, NTXEC_POWERKEEP, 0x08);
> +		if (res < 0)
> +			return res;
> +
> +		/* Install poweroff handler */
> +		WARN_ON(poweroff_restart_instance);
> +		poweroff_restart_instance = ec;
> +		if (pm_power_off != NULL)
> +			/* TODO: Refactor among all poweroff drivers */
> +			dev_err(ec->dev, "pm_power_off already assigned\n");
> +		else
> +			pm_power_off = ntxec_poweroff;
> +
common pattern, across drivers, so I think doing something else would
be a separate cleanup issue.

Regards,
Andreas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists