linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Move ignore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:24:34 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Move ignore_msrs handling upper the stack

On 26/06/20 20:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Btw, would it be more staightforward to check "vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities &
>> ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR" rather than "*ebx | (F(RTM) | F(HLE))" even if we want
>> to have such a fix?
> Not really, That ends up duplicating the check in vmx_get_msr().  From an
> emulation perspective, this really is a "guest" access to the MSR, in the
> sense that it the virtual CPU is in the guest domain, i.e. not a god-like
> entity that gets to break the rules of emulation.

But if you wrote a guest that wants to read MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL, there are
two choices:

1) check ARCH_CAPABILITIES first

2) blindly access it and default to 0.

Both are fine, because we know MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL has no
reserved/must-be-one bits.  Calling __kvm_get_msr and checking for an
invalid MSR through the return value is not breaking the rules of
emulation, it is "faking" a #GP handler.

So I think Peter's patch is fine, but (possibly on top as a third patch)
__must_check should be added to MSR getters and setters.  Also one
possibility is to return -EINVAL for invalid MSRs.

Paolo