linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: add GPO driver for PCA9570

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 27 Jun 2020 18:58:54 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Sungbo Eo <mans0n@...ani.run>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add GPO driver for PCA9570

Hi,

Am 2020-06-24 16:52, schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:46 PM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:

[..]

>> So you just write one byte of data (or you might repeat it, but
>> that is just as if you start a new i2c transaction, just that
>> you save the i2c addressing).
> 
> You can write the same value twice.
> It means that the first byte can represent the register address. But
> it's still too volatile.

In this case the output pin will hold the value of the "fake" address
register for a short period of time. No?

> Perhaps regmap can gain something like register-less communication.

I don't know if that is worth it (and if that is an intended use of
regmap).

-michael