[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiKCXEWKJ9dWUimGbrVRo_N2RosESUw8E7m9AEtyZcu=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:01:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/32] linux/bits.h: fix unsigned less than zero warnings
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:03 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> How about moving that warning from W=1 to W=2?
That sounds like the right thing to do, perhaps with some extra
warnings about W=2 (and W=3) being things that you definitely
shouldn't be running in automated environments (unless you are then
very very careful to look very critically at the warnings).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists