| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200628085032.GT5535@shao2-debian>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:50:32 +0800
From: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: [bpf] af7ec13833: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.5% regression
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -2.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
commit: af7ec13833619e17f03aa73a785a2f871da6d66b ("bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock() helper")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
in testcase: will-it-scale
on test machine: 192 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory
with following parameters:
nr_task: 16
mode: process
test: mmap1
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x5002f01
test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp run job.yaml
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-7.6/process/16/debian-x86_64-20191114.cgz/lkp-csl-2ap2/mmap1/will-it-scale/0x5002f01
commit:
72e2b2b66f ("bpf: Allow tracing programs to use bpf_jiffies64() helper")
af7ec13833 ("bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock() helper")
72e2b2b66f9c1225 af7ec13833619e17f03aa73a785
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
124208 -2.5% 121095 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
1987348 -2.5% 1937535 will-it-scale.workload
0.10 -0.0 0.08 mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
76456 ±133% +332.5% 330696 ± 65% numa-numastat.node3.local_node
107479 ± 95% +229.4% 354010 ± 58% numa-numastat.node3.numa_hit
7491 ± 4% -12.3% 6570 numa-vmstat.node1.nr_kernel_stack
1512 +52.2% 2303 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mapped
6256 ± 6% +155.0% 15951 ± 41% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_active_anon
1827 ± 13% +551.0% 11893 ± 57% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_anon_pages
6256 ± 6% +155.0% 15951 ± 41% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_zone_active_anon
32772 ± 15% -32.9% 21975 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.avg
53516 ± 13% -19.2% 43219 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
16.36 ± 6% -12.4% 14.33 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.avg
565215 ± 15% -31.6% 386808 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
1795645 ± 29% -30.5% 1248436 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.max
7492 ± 4% -12.3% 6567 numa-meminfo.node1.KernelStack
6048 +48.1% 8958 ± 29% numa-meminfo.node1.Mapped
810760 ± 3% -6.2% 760309 ± 6% numa-meminfo.node2.MemUsed
25061 ± 6% +158.8% 64865 ± 41% numa-meminfo.node3.Active
25053 ± 6% +154.7% 63821 ± 41% numa-meminfo.node3.Active(anon)
1.50 ±173% +1.7e+06% 25830 ± 96% numa-meminfo.node3.AnonHugePages
7307 ± 13% +550.9% 47561 ± 57% numa-meminfo.node3.AnonPages
3546 ±144% -87.2% 454.50 ± 10% interrupts.CPU0.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
813.25 +70.0% 1382 ± 6% interrupts.CPU1.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
71.00 ± 26% +43.0% 101.50 ± 5% interrupts.CPU112.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
71.00 ± 26% +43.0% 101.50 ± 5% interrupts.CPU112.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
799.00 +21.2% 968.75 ± 20% interrupts.CPU150.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
514.75 ± 31% +42.1% 731.50 ± 23% interrupts.CPU169.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
177.25 ± 10% -38.9% 108.25 ± 33% interrupts.CPU177.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
177.25 ± 10% -38.9% 108.25 ± 33% interrupts.CPU177.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
165.25 -22.8% 127.50 ± 19% interrupts.CPU81.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
165.25 -22.8% 127.50 ± 19% interrupts.CPU81.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3.05 ± 6% +0.5 3.52 ± 11% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry
1.15 ± 17% +0.6 1.80 ± 19% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64
4.44 ± 5% +0.7 5.15 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unmap_page_range.unmap_vmas.unmap_region.__do_munmap.__vm_munmap
4.90 ± 6% +0.7 5.63 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unmap_vmas.unmap_region.__do_munmap.__vm_munmap.__x64_sys_munmap
0.10 ± 5% -0.0 0.07 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__prepare_exit_to_usermode
0.35 ± 7% +0.1 0.40 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
0.09 ± 64% +0.1 0.17 ± 31% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_irq_exit
0.29 ± 14% +0.1 0.39 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.clockevents_program_event
1.16 ± 17% +0.6 1.81 ± 19% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.menu_select
4.91 ± 6% +0.7 5.64 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unmap_vmas
4.79 ± 5% +0.7 5.52 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unmap_page_range
2.01 ± 6% +0.5 2.50 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.unmap_page_range
0.49 ± 53% +0.5 1.02 ± 34% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state
0.56 ± 42% +0.6 1.15 ± 35% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.menu_select
5.756e+09 -2.0% 5.644e+09 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
0.76 ± 23% -0.2 0.55 ± 32% perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
43877584 ± 23% -29.8% 30789677 ± 32% perf-stat.i.branch-misses
7.017e+09 -1.8% 6.89e+09 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
2.747e+09 -2.3% 2.684e+09 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
2.46e+10 -1.9% 2.412e+10 perf-stat.i.instructions
82.00 -2.2% 80.20 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
0.76 ± 23% -0.2 0.55 ± 32% perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
5.737e+09 -2.0% 5.625e+09 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
43726188 ± 23% -29.8% 30693805 ± 32% perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
6.994e+09 -1.8% 6.867e+09 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
2.738e+09 -2.3% 2.675e+09 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
2.451e+10 -1.9% 2.404e+10 perf-stat.ps.instructions
7.409e+12 -2.0% 7.263e+12 perf-stat.total.instructions
161023 -15.8% 135597 ± 14% softirqs.CPU0.TIMER
156141 ± 2% -17.9% 128125 ± 15% softirqs.CPU10.TIMER
157518 -14.0% 135498 ± 11% softirqs.CPU100.TIMER
154277 ± 2% -17.7% 126919 ± 15% softirqs.CPU101.TIMER
157440 -14.3% 134970 ± 10% softirqs.CPU102.TIMER
154378 ± 2% -16.3% 129169 ± 16% softirqs.CPU103.TIMER
41427 -43.4% 23450 ± 54% softirqs.CPU104.SCHED
154175 ± 2% -17.7% 126885 ± 15% softirqs.CPU105.TIMER
157484 -14.5% 134616 ± 11% softirqs.CPU106.TIMER
155021 -18.1% 126948 ± 15% softirqs.CPU107.TIMER
41420 -55.7% 18328 ± 80% softirqs.CPU108.SCHED
157475 -15.2% 133509 ± 11% softirqs.CPU108.TIMER
154380 ± 2% -17.8% 126972 ± 15% softirqs.CPU109.TIMER
158325 ± 3% -15.1% 134489 ± 11% softirqs.CPU11.TIMER
157174 -14.2% 134838 ± 11% softirqs.CPU110.TIMER
154171 ± 2% -17.6% 126978 ± 15% softirqs.CPU111.TIMER
157383 -16.5% 131351 ± 15% softirqs.CPU112.TIMER
157651 -17.0% 130902 ± 15% softirqs.CPU113.TIMER
40573 ± 2% -32.7% 27323 ± 25% softirqs.CPU114.SCHED
157205 -16.9% 130703 ± 15% softirqs.CPU114.TIMER
40295 ± 2% -29.9% 28240 ± 33% softirqs.CPU115.SCHED
157494 -16.8% 131103 ± 17% softirqs.CPU115.TIMER
158789 -17.6% 130918 ± 15% softirqs.CPU116.TIMER
157181 -16.2% 131773 ± 15% softirqs.CPU117.TIMER
40307 ± 2% -29.9% 28267 ± 15% softirqs.CPU118.SCHED
157772 -17.1% 130860 ± 16% softirqs.CPU118.TIMER
40343 ± 2% -25.6% 30028 ± 18% softirqs.CPU119.SCHED
157242 -16.7% 130914 ± 16% softirqs.CPU119.TIMER
156122 ± 3% -17.3% 129101 ± 16% softirqs.CPU12.TIMER
38457 ± 4% -9.0% 34980 ± 9% softirqs.CPU122.SCHED
39836 ± 2% -12.2% 34986 ± 5% softirqs.CPU123.SCHED
161083 ± 2% -15.2% 136601 ± 11% softirqs.CPU13.TIMER
155511 ± 2% -17.9% 127705 ± 15% softirqs.CPU14.TIMER
94832 ± 6% +32.1% 125303 ± 16% softirqs.CPU144.TIMER
91430 ± 7% +35.6% 123962 ± 16% softirqs.CPU145.TIMER
159196 -14.1% 136742 ± 11% softirqs.CPU15.TIMER
101913 ± 4% +21.8% 124180 ± 16% softirqs.CPU150.TIMER
92878 ± 6% +32.1% 122715 ± 17% softirqs.CPU151.TIMER
97986 ± 4% +26.2% 123633 ± 16% softirqs.CPU153.TIMER
95855 ± 5% +29.5% 124173 ± 16% softirqs.CPU155.TIMER
92790 ± 6% +32.7% 123146 ± 17% softirqs.CPU156.TIMER
97758 ± 6% +26.2% 123397 ± 17% softirqs.CPU157.TIMER
93450 ± 6% +32.0% 123341 ± 17% softirqs.CPU159.TIMER
92632 ± 6% +34.7% 124781 ± 17% softirqs.CPU162.TIMER
102121 ± 7% +21.0% 123517 ± 16% softirqs.CPU163.TIMER
104450 ± 4% +19.0% 124312 ± 16% softirqs.CPU165.TIMER
97581 ± 8% +26.3% 123253 ± 17% softirqs.CPU167.TIMER
155698 ± 2% -17.4% 128615 ± 16% softirqs.CPU2.TIMER
39566 ± 6% -16.0% 33236 ± 7% softirqs.CPU21.SCHED
40546 ± 2% -12.4% 35536 ± 8% softirqs.CPU27.SCHED
159665 -15.4% 135050 ± 11% softirqs.CPU3.TIMER
39524 ± 3% -16.8% 32901 ± 10% softirqs.CPU31.SCHED
3836 +221.3% 12323 ±115% softirqs.CPU4.SCHED
155133 ± 2% -17.5% 127978 ± 16% softirqs.CPU4.TIMER
95925 ± 6% +25.0% 119877 ± 19% softirqs.CPU48.TIMER
158122 -14.5% 135135 ± 10% softirqs.CPU5.TIMER
96117 ± 7% +24.8% 119976 ± 19% softirqs.CPU50.TIMER
94315 ± 7% +27.2% 120006 ± 19% softirqs.CPU55.TIMER
96872 ± 6% +23.4% 119544 ± 19% softirqs.CPU59.TIMER
93665 ± 7% +27.4% 119361 ± 20% softirqs.CPU60.TIMER
94927 ± 7% +26.4% 120029 ± 19% softirqs.CPU63.TIMER
94113 ± 7% +27.0% 119562 ± 19% softirqs.CPU66.TIMER
154828 ± 2% -17.4% 127819 ± 15% softirqs.CPU8.TIMER
159303 -14.6% 136018 ± 11% softirqs.CPU9.TIMER
155029 -15.3% 131284 ± 10% softirqs.CPU96.TIMER
154115 ± 2% -17.7% 126912 ± 15% softirqs.CPU97.TIMER
41358 -44.5% 22973 ± 57% softirqs.CPU98.SCHED
157639 -14.5% 134799 ± 11% softirqs.CPU98.TIMER
154157 ± 2% -17.7% 126852 ± 15% softirqs.CPU99.TIMER
will-it-scale.per_process_ops
132000 +------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
130000 |.++.+.++.+.++.+.+ +.+.+.+ |
| : : : |
128000 |-+ : : : |
| : : : |
126000 |-+ : : : |
| : : : |
124000 |-+ +.+.++.+.+ +.+.++.+.++.+ |
| |
122000 |-+ O O O O OO O OO O OO O OO O |
| O O OO O OO O OO |
120000 |-+ O OO O OO O O O |
| |
118000 +------------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Rong Chen
View attachment "config-5.8.0-rc1-00160-gaf7ec13833619" of type "text/plain" (206210 bytes)
View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (7497 bytes)
View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (5064 bytes)
View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (337 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists