linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: function: printer: The device interface is reset and should return error code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Jun 2020 16:13:39 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: function: printer: The device interface is
 reset and should return error code

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> I suggest to choose a more succinct patch subject.
> 
> 
> > After the device is disconnected from the host side, the interface of
> > the device is reset. If the userspace operates the device again,
> > an error code should be returned.
> 
> Please use an imperative wording for the commit message.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=719fdd32921fb7e3208db8832d32ae1c2d68900f#n151
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
> 
> Did you really specify your real name here?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot